Serkan Cengiz Avukatlık & Danışmanlık Bürosu Serkan Cengiz Legal & Consultancy Services

Serkan Cengiz Legal & Consultancy Services
Serkan Cengiz Avukatlık ve Danışmanlık Bürosu Serkan Cengiz Legal and Consultancy Services
 
Judgment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (violation of Article 17 of the Constitution due to denial of compensation for medical negligence)
Sakaoğlu v. Turkey (violation of Article 6- access to a court and violation of Article 8- usage of unlawfully obtanined telephone interceptions in a disciplinary proceedings)
Karatay v. Turkey (violation of Article 8 and partial striking out of the complaint due to unilateral declaration of the Government)
Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (No.2) (arbitrary and unlawful detention of head of Amnesty International Turkey branch, violation of Articles 5/1, 5/3, 5/5 and 10 of the Convention)
Başpınaroğlu v. Turkey
Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararı (Yiğit Aksakoğlu Başvurusu, Başvuru No: 2019/7132, Karar Tarihi: 03.12.2020, tutuklama kararının hukuka aykırı olması, Anayasa mad.19/3)
Judgment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (violation of right to fair trial due to unreasonable lenght of the proceedings)
Atay v.Turkey (Article 6, violation of right to fair trial, in a criminal proceedings inability to question witnesses of the other party, inability to appeal against the fine, violation of Article 6 for the latter complaint)
Ali Bozan v. Turkey (Article 10, violation of freedom of expression of a politician)
Yayla v.Turkey (Article 8, protection of reputation against freedom of press, violation of Article 8 of the Convention)
Çelebi v.Turkey (Article 6, access to court, struck out of the list on the basis of unilateral declaration of the Government)
Kazan v. Turkey (Article 10, freedom of expression of a lawyer, struck out of the list on the basis of unilateral declaration of the Government)
Cangı v.Turkey
Judgment of the Turkish Counstitutional Court (violation of right to possession due to nonpayment of the renumeration of the fee of a forensic expert)
Judgment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (deprivation of possession, unreasonable lenght of the domestic proceedings)
Judgment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (development of personality and well-being, protection of private life, fair trial)
G.U. v. Turkey (Ineffective investigation concerning the alleged rape of a victim by her step father, violation of Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights)
Judgment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (peaceful enjoyment of property and lenght of the domestic proceedings, appl. no.2013/9463)
Cengiz and others v. Turkey (violation of Article 10 of the Convention due to blocking access to YouTube.com)
Judgment of the Turkish Constitutional Court (prisoner's right to access information and his right to freedom of expression - appl. no.2012/990)
Reznik v. Russia (violation of Article 10 of the Convention)
Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey
Söyler v. Turkey (automatic and indiscriminate ban on prisoners’ voting rights in Turkey is too harsh and it therefore violates Article 3 of Protocol no.1 of the Convention)
Mehmet Şentürk and Bekir Şentürk v. Turkey (death of a pregnant woman not given appropriate emergency treatment, substantial and procedural violation of Article 2 of the Convention)
X v. Turkey (solitary confinement of a gay detainee more than eight months in a prison cell, violation of Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention)
Eski v. Turkey (violation of Article 3 of the Convention, ineffectiveness of the domestic law)
Pekaslan and Others v. Turkey (violation of Articles 3 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights)
Erciyas v. Turkey (violation of Article 6/1 of the European Convention on Human Rights)
Süleyman Deniz v. Turkey (detention of an unsound mind in a overcrowded general prison, unreasonable lenght of his detention and the criminal proceedings against him)
Schalk and Kopf v. Austria
Gülperi Balo v. Turkey (access to her late partner's pension and health insurance, partial inadmissibility)
Salmanoğlu and Polattaş v. Turkey
Terzioğlu and Others v. Turkey
Erdem and Egin Erdem and Others v. Turkey
Akbulut v. Turkey (criminal proceedings without holding a hearing)
Saya and Others v. Turkey (right to organize and participate public demonstrations and meetings)
Yıldırım v. Turkey (protection of private life, freedom of expression of press)
Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen Gmbh / Austria (search in a law office and seizure of electronic and printed data)
Tolga Nart v. Turkey (arrest of minors / maximum period in respect of their pretrial detention)
Akgöçmen v. Turkey (adequate time for defence, change of the accusation at the last hearing)
Giacomelli v. Italy (protection of environment, right to respect for family and private life and home)
Aizsardzibas Klubs v. Latvia (potection of environment, role of watchdogs, freedom of expression)
E.A. Arrondelle v. the United Kingdom (prevention of noise pollution, ineffectiveness of domestic avenues, friendly settlement)
D.A and B.Y v. Turkey (excessive lenght of detention)
Dağlı v.Turkey (right to have a hearing)
Ali Albayrak v. Turkey (excessive lenght of the criminal proceedings, friendly settlement)
Fahriye Çalışkan v. Turkey (Mal-treatment, Ineffectiveness of Domestic Remedies)
Gavrikova v. Russia
Ponomarenko v. Russia
Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey (The judgement of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the 10% national electoral threshold in Turkey)
Agga v. Greece
Caroline Hannover v. Germany
Osman Murat Ülke v. Turkey
M.M v. The Netherlands
Leyla Şahin v. Turkey (Freedom of religion)
Thlimmenos v. Greece
Taşkın and Others v. Turkey
Akman v. Turkey
Tahsin ACAR v. Turkey
T.A v.Turkey
Kalashnikov v. Rusia
Buldan v. Turkey
Bankoviç v. Members of NATO
Milosoviç v.The Netherlands
Vasileva v. Denmark
Willis v. United Kingdom

09/03/17

Application by T.A.A (application no.2014/19081, 01.02.2017)

The Turkish Constitutional Court announced on 10 March 2017 that the applicant's right to develop his personality and well-being (Article 17 of the Constitution), to enjoy his private life (Article 20 of the Constitution) and to have his case heard according to trial rights principles (Article 36 of the Constitution) were violated.

Text of the judgment (Turkish)